U Visa provisional approval for menacing with a knife where there is no physical harm
June 2, 2014
I received a provisional approval for a U Visa that associate attorney Diane Grover and I have been working on for quite some time. A U Visa is for an alien without status who has been the victim of a crime such as assault, rape, etc. This provisional approval is huge, because I was skeptical about the Immigration Service (CIS) approving an application where the crime was menacing (with a knife) without any physical harm. All U Visas are given out for this fiscal year, so my client gets deferred action (protection from deportation) until the application is formally approved next fiscal year.
Posted by immigrationlawyer4u
Filed in Uncategorized ·Tags: 212(a)(9)(B), 212(a)(9)(C), 212c, 245i, advance parole, affidavit of support, asbury law offices, asylum, BCC, BIA, bona fide, bona fide marriage, bona fides, bond removal proceedings, border crossing card, Cancellation of Removal, CDJ, CIMT, CIS, ciudad juarez, court of appeals, crime of moral turpitude, DACA, DACA-10, DACA-100, DACA-11, DACA-12, DACA-13, DACA-14, DACA-15, DACA-16, DACA-17, DACA-18, DACA-19, DACA-2, DACA-20, DACA-21, DACA-22, DACA-23, DACA-24, DACA-25, DACA-26, DACA-27, DACA-28, DACA-29, DACA-3, DACA-30, DACA-31, DACA-32, DACA-33, DACA-34, DACA-35, DACA-36, DACA-37, DACA-38, DACA-39, DACA-4, DACA-40, DACA-41, DACA-42, DACA-43, DACA-44, DACA-45, DACA-46, DACA-47, DACA-48, DACA-49, DACA-5, DACA-50, DACA-51, DACA-52, DACA-53, DACA-54, DACA-55, DACA-56, DACA-57, DACA-58, DACA-59, DACA-6, DACA-60, DACA-61, DACA-62, DACA-63, DACA-64, DACA-65, DACA-66, DACA-67, DACA-68, DACA-69, DACA-7, DACA-70, DACA-71, DACA-72, DACA-73, DACA-74, DACA-75, DACA-76, DACA-77, DACA-78, DACA-79, DACA-8, DACA-80, DACA-81, DACA-82, DACA-83, DACA-84, DACA-85, DACA-86, DACA-87, DACA-88, DACA-89, DACA-9, DACA-90, DACA-91, DACA-92, DACA-93, DACA-94, DACA-95, DACA-96, DACA-97, DACA-98, DACA-99, Deferred Action, deportable, deportation, deportation proceedings, detention, detention center Tacoma, detention Tacoma, DHS, EOIR-42A, EOIR-42B, EWI, exceptional and extremely unusual hardship, exceptional hardship, extreme hardship, FOIA, Form I-213, good moral character, green card, I-130, I-131, I-134, I-20, I-212, I-213, I-213 form, I-290B DACA-1, I-485, I-601, I-612, I-765, I-765sw, I-821D, I-824, I-864, I-94, ice, immigration attorney, immigration court, Immigration Judge, immigration lawyer, immigration solutions, inadmissibility, inadmissible, J-1, marriage fraud, motion to reopen, MTR, N-400, N-648, naturalization, NOID, NOIR, northwest detention center, Notice of Intent to Deny, Notice of Intent to Revoke, Notice to Appear, NTA, Portland immigration attorney, Portland immigration court, portland immigration lawyer, refugee, relief from removal, removable, removal, removal order, removal proceedings, sam asbury, Seattle immigration attorney, seattle immigration court, Seattle immigration lawyer, sham marriage, sibling petition, supreme court, Tacoma immigration attorney, tacoma immigration court, Tacoma immigration lawyer, Tampa immigration attorney, tampa immigration court, Tampa immigration lawyer, temporary protected status, Ten year bar, TPS, two year foreign residence, U Visa, VAWA, visa bulletin, voluntary departure, without inspection, work permit
Immigrationlawyer4u's Blog 