Motion to Reopen to rid of Removal Order to proceed with USC son’s I-130 petition
June 11, 2014
I met with a man in Tukwila, yesterday, who entered the USA with a tourist visa and whose 25yo son is a US citizen. Easy, right? Son petitions for dad, and dad gets a green card. The problem is a removal order from two years ago. Apparently he never received the Notice of Hearing from the court and so he was ordered removed in absentia (in his absence). The plan is to file a Motion to Reopen, and then we can proceed with the green card application based on son’s petition.
Posted by immigrationlawyer4u
Filed in Uncategorized ·Tags: 212(a)(9)(B), 212(a)(9)(C), 212c, 245i, advance parole, affidavit of support, asbury law offices, asylum, BCC, BIA, bona fide, bona fide marriage, bona fides, bond removal proceedings, border crossing card, Cancellation of Removal, CDJ, CIMT, CIS, ciudad juarez, court of appeals, crime of moral turpitude, DACA, DACA-10, DACA-100, DACA-11, DACA-12, DACA-13, DACA-14, DACA-15, DACA-16, DACA-17, DACA-18, DACA-19, DACA-2, DACA-20, DACA-21, DACA-22, DACA-23, DACA-24, DACA-25, DACA-26, DACA-27, DACA-28, DACA-29, DACA-3, DACA-30, DACA-31, DACA-32, DACA-33, DACA-34, DACA-35, DACA-36, DACA-37, DACA-38, DACA-39, DACA-4, DACA-40, DACA-41, DACA-42, DACA-43, DACA-44, DACA-45, DACA-46, DACA-47, DACA-48, DACA-49, DACA-5, DACA-50, DACA-51, DACA-52, DACA-53, DACA-54, DACA-55, DACA-56, DACA-57, DACA-58, DACA-59, DACA-6, DACA-60, DACA-61, DACA-62, DACA-63, DACA-64, DACA-65, DACA-66, DACA-67, DACA-68, DACA-69, DACA-7, DACA-70, DACA-71, DACA-72, DACA-73, DACA-74, DACA-75, DACA-76, DACA-77, DACA-78, DACA-79, DACA-8, DACA-80, DACA-81, DACA-82, DACA-83, DACA-84, DACA-85, DACA-86, DACA-87, DACA-88, DACA-89, DACA-9, DACA-90, DACA-91, DACA-92, DACA-93, DACA-94, DACA-95, DACA-96, DACA-97, DACA-98, DACA-99, Deferred Action, deportable, deportation, deportation proceedings, detention, detention center Tacoma, detention Tacoma, DHS, EOIR-42A, EOIR-42B, EWI, exceptional and extremely unusual hardship, exceptional hardship, extreme hardship, FOIA, Form I-213, good moral character, green card, I-130, I-131, I-134, I-20, I-212, I-213, I-213 form, I-290B DACA-1, I-485, I-601, I-612, I-765, I-765sw, I-821D, I-824, I-864, I-94, ice, immigration attorney, immigration court, Immigration Judge, immigration lawyer, immigration solutions, inadmissibility, inadmissible, J-1, marriage fraud, motion to reopen, MTR, N-400, N-648, naturalization, NOID, NOIR, northwest detention center, Notice of Intent to Deny, Notice of Intent to Revoke, Notice to Appear, NTA, Portland immigration attorney, Portland immigration court, portland immigration lawyer, refugee, relief from removal, removable, removal, removal order, removal proceedings, sam asbury, Seattle immigration attorney, seattle immigration court, Seattle immigration lawyer, sham marriage, sibling petition, supreme court, Tacoma immigration attorney, tacoma immigration court, Tacoma immigration lawyer, Tampa immigration attorney, tampa immigration court, Tampa immigration lawyer, temporary protected status, Ten year bar, TPS, two year foreign residence, U Visa, VAWA, visa bulletin, voluntary departure, without inspection, work permit
Immigrationlawyer4u's Blog 