Disturbing trend in I-601A adjudications

In 2014, I started seeing a disturbing new pattern in I-601A adjudications. USCIS started issuing requests for additional evidence (RFE) in which it minimizes the psychological evaluations of the USC (now LPR or USC) spouses. CIS continues to do this, and I have seen many RFEs with this or similar language: “the record fails to reflect an ongoing relationship between a mental health professional and [applicant]. Any conclusions reached in the submitted evaluation do not reflect the insight and elaboration commensurate with an established relationship with a psychologist or mental professional. This renders the findings speculative and diminishes the consultation’s value in the determination of extreme hardship.”

When the LPR/USC spouse has never seen a counselor/psychologist/psychiatrist before, that RFE can pose a huge obstacle. I have been working with a particular Clinical Psychologist (Psy.D.) for many years, and we have created an effective strategy for dealing with this.

If you or your spouse will need to file an I-601 or I-601A and prove extreme hardship, contact me so that I can evaluate your chances of approval. Although my primary offices are in Tampa, Florida, and Gresham, Oregon, I handle cases for immigration clients all over the USA and throughout the world. My email address is samasbury@comcast.net. Also see my FaceBook page called immigration-solutions.